

DxO says that it sets the high bar for image sensor quality. Let's see how it is compared against the current line of the Pentax DSLRs! Don't see a K-5II and IIs? I'm afraid Pentax has not yet given a test sample to them earlier. And even though they have already done that, *miracle* for big advancement in the results is NOT expected, by considering that the II and the original I are with the same sensor and even same old image processor!
Tomasz Worek · 650 weeks ago
Actually this comparison proofs that K-5 sensor is still one of the best, even when compared to FF.
PentaxUser · 650 weeks ago
Capelson · 650 weeks ago
VladimirYo · 650 weeks ago
Ertogog · 650 weeks ago
Guest · 650 weeks ago
Just wait a minute and Pentax K-5 II/s will be tested there. It is still pre-production.
You will have probably the reason to write your opinion after this test. And it will be the right time.
justmy2cents · 650 weeks ago
zosX · 650 weeks ago
Guest · 650 weeks ago
I really want to understand why you are so morosly bashing against (Pentax?) APC cameras.
Not so long ago your site was an inspiring source of information. But now?
Greetings from Austria
(Excuse my bad English)
Michael A. · 650 weeks ago
Lurker · 650 weeks ago
Come on Rice, you know Pentax is not capable of manufacturing it's own sensors. It has to depend on someone for that.
While I agree that they should at least say there are plans for it (I guess that's mentioned in the Photokina interviews, somehow), they cannot make a definite commitment if they won't eventually get the sensors.
Let's assume Sony requires 10,000 units to make a deal. Pentax doesn't even know if they can sell all that. And how much do they cost? You don't go in a business to lose money.
Just my two cents.
anonymous · 650 weeks ago
Otherwise, no advantage. All other stuff, like more pixels, better noise in high ISO and AF performance (I do not use AF at all) mean nothing to me.
Jaz Johal · 649 weeks ago
its been a pretty slow mis diagnosed death, good thing your not a doctor....
Jerry S. · 649 weeks ago
It's just a stop gap product to help sell Pentax failed products like K-30 and K-01, that failed miserably in the consumer market.
No successful company would release something like K-5II, basically a re-boxed two year old model K-5, and expect customers to buy it.
Jorge · 649 weeks ago
http://www.yaotomi.co.jp/blog/used/2012/09/-penta...
someguy · 649 weeks ago
quinquen · 649 weeks ago
Jorge · 649 weeks ago
Ricardo · 649 weeks ago
Pentax K-5: 14.1 Evs
D600: 14.2 Evs
The same(almost) dinamic range, but the D600 is arround 3X times expensive than the Pentax K-5 and . With all respect, you have to be very STUPID to go for the Nikon. We even not see the K-5II(s) results yet.