Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: Rumour: Pentax Q-7

Monday, June 10, 2013

Rumour: Pentax Q-7

See this latest rumour about the "upcoming" Pentax Q-7:-

http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/new-pentax-q7-will-have-a-larger-11-7-inch-sensor/

The new Q-7 will be in Q-mount (of course) but will incorporate a larger 1/1.7" sensor, source of "leaked" information from the Japanese Digicame-info.com (Google-translated), which should be reliable enough for their past track records.

Btw, the Q-mount actually could accommodate a 1/1.7" sensor, yet with the possibility of the in-body SR, see my previous illustration below:-



Above: The Q-mount and possible sensor sizes; Original posted: http://ricehigh.blogspot.com/2011/06/how-large-sensor-that-pentax-could-put.html.

So, what will happen with the original Q lenses then? Well, suppose the image circle is large enough to cover, the 01 "standard prime" lens will become a 35mm standard wide (135 film wise) and the 02 "standard zoom" will become a 21-63mm lens, which I don't think the image circle is large enough for the wide side. Thus, that explains why we saw a new standard zoom patent from Pentax Ricoh before, with a 1/1.7" image circle, details here.


Related:- 

How Large a Sensor that Pentax Could Put Into the Q?

New Ricoh Flagship P&S, or Yet Another GXR Module?

Sensor Sizes Re-visited, including the Latest Rumoured Nikon and Fuji Mirrorlesses

Comments (5)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
1/1.7" sensor is lame. It is not big enough to really make a big impact. Why not keep using the 1/2,3" sensor but instead add a speedbooster/focal length reducer to the body?
Dan Johnson's avatar

Dan Johnson · 616 weeks ago

That really pales in comparison to Sigma's f/1.8 Zoom, If their rumored Full Frame Zoom is 35mm-135mm f/1.8 all I need for primes is 24mm or wider manual focus (for the few times you focus super wides at all) let alone high speed auto-focus.
Rice -
you are frequently referring to Pentax patents when it comes to lenses and the roadmap. I have a question about this: how come that it is possible at all, hundreds of years after the first lens was assembled, that there are still "inventions" with each and every new lens? Shouldn't the field be completely out-invented by now? I'm puzzled.
Best,
Chris
1 reply · active 616 weeks ago
Nowadays, patents means designs, they are purely evolutions, but not inventions anymore.
Snappertim's avatar

Snappertim · 616 weeks ago

Well well locks like Ricoh has a larger say when it comes to buying sensors, Sony obvoiously are prepaired to sell them sensors they would not sell to Hoya, maybe a good thing for pentax users in the future ???.
Regards Snappertim

Post a new comment

Comments by