Nevertheless, I hope this measure would be an interim one, until I can find out a better solution to the problem without taking out this *option* from my regular readers who subscribed and read via the RSS feed in a consistent basis, and mostly.
Update (8-22):-
I feel there is a need to publish the Whois registrant information here for a recent major scraper site who consistently steals contents from my site (and many others' as well) using robot but whom intentionally remove all the embedded links of others' articles stolen (not even to say making any attribution to the original authorships!). Here it is:-
"Registrant:
Domains by Proxy, Inc.
DomainsByProxy.com
15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
United States
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: [Deleted]
Created on: 27-Apr-11
Expires on: 27-Apr-12
Last Updated on: 07-Jun-11
Administrative Contact:
Private, Registration [Deleted]@domainsbyproxy.com
Domains by Proxy, Inc.
DomainsByProxy.com
15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
United States
(480) 624-2599 Fax -- (480) 624-2598
Technical Contact:
Private, Registration [Deleted]@domainsbyproxy.com
Domains by Proxy, Inc.
DomainsByProxy.com
15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
United States
(480) 624-2599 Fax -- (480) 624-2598
Domain servers in listed order:
NS21.IXWEBHOSTING.COM
NS22.IXWEBHOSTING.COM"
Well, you thief, if you read this, I just wish to ask: What are you doing? Why are you doing this? Do you feel ashamed of what you do?? >:-|
Update (8-23):-
Someone asked me to disclose the IP (or simply the Domain) of that particular offending website (instead of the registrant as shown above, whom is just a Proxy) but then strangely assumed that I didn't know the IP. Actually, I knew it. However, for the sake of safety for all my readers and by no means I should publicise the theft site here at all as well, I shall not disclose it fully but will only show the following, still:-

As I have already replied, the problem is not as simple as one would suppose. Usually, looking things from the topmost surface won't help anything. The battles and wars between the two confronting sides are always ongoing, and those thief webmasters knew very well how to do the theft in many different ways!
Most importantly, it should and must be noted that it's me and my readers whom are the victims. In particular, I firmly believe that I am NOT the one whom should be blamed. Is it my fault of me in any way when my own Blog contents are stolen? WHO have been doing wrong, illegally and unethically actually after all?? >:-[
vega · 707 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 707 weeks ago
Sid · 707 weeks ago
Actually it does. And to me, all that sounds a silly excuse to make your hit counter get higher...
RiceHigh 110p · 707 weeks ago
After all, this is not an "excuse" of me myself against what you supposed and accused, but I have to protect my own works and intellectual property at the end of the day, which I have spent a lot of efforts and time to research and prepare.
P.S. The 1001 Noisy Cameras have also done the same starting from today.
Sam Smith · 707 weeks ago
Domains by Proxy is NOT the owner of the domain in question, but merely a service offered by many registrars that allows the real owner to anonymize their contact details. Your post therefore just seems silly.
Post the name of the offending domain, and it's IP address. That's what would be really helpful, because then people can block that site from hitting their own web pages.
RiceHigh 110p · 707 weeks ago
Sam Smith · 707 weeks ago
Also 'scraping' not 'scrapping'.
IP address blocking is indeed a very good way to stop scrapers. Smart web site managers use it routinely, alongside other anti-scraping strategies. You may know cameras, but you don't know web. Hence your scraping problem.
RiceHigh 110p · 707 weeks ago
111 · 707 weeks ago
scraping and scrapping are two different things, British English or otherwise.
RiceHigh 110p · 707 weeks ago
Michael A. · 707 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 707 weeks ago
Michael A. · 707 weeks ago