Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: More Q Samples (Daylight Mostly)

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

More Q Samples (Daylight Mostly)

They are continued to be posted at the Japanese Yaotomi's Blog lately:-

http://www.yaotomi.co.jp/blog/walk/



More: http://www.yaotomi.co.jp/blog/walk/2011/08/pentax-q-01-standard-prime-1.html



More: http://www.yaotomi.co.jp/blog/walk/2011/08/pentax-q-01-standard-prime.html

Full EXIF data are preserved for these samples this time. I note one interesting thing about the setting is that now the blogger (Yaotomi) has used fixed aperture at f/3.2 for many of his latest photos. I bet this would be the optimal single setting he's discovered, as wide opened will not be the best for the optical performance of the lens whilst closing down further the resolution is inevitably affected by diffraction (real-world proof here). In addition, shooting outdoor with relative too large a f-number/aperture is also impractical after all. (He seems to know well how to use his camera tactically, so as to avoid the pitfalls of it! Nice done, guy!~)

Besides, the colour rendition of the Q could look awful, just look at this example for the "blue" sky colour, which is terribly grey-n-darkish and unrealistic:-



And, I am not impressed with the Dynamic Range (DR) of the Q, which just looks rather limited for most of the contrasty outdoor scenes and samples that I have seen, e.g.:-



See also the previous "leaked" Q samples by this Pentax guy and it is not difficult to observe about the low DR of the Q:-

Large Size Pentax Q Sample Photos Plus Hands-on Movie Review Posted by Pentax Insider

Btw, we can continue to keep a close eye on Yaotomi's blog as he seems to be one of the first retailers whom was given a Q and was allowed to post those "user" full samples.

Still, I recommend you to compare those lately posted samples, against those few samples of the latest Pentax P&S DC model, which I've lately acquired, for finding any IQ difference. Note that both the Q and my WG-1 GPS are using the same 1/2.3" sized sensor, which is a CMOS and a CCD one respectively, though. I do like more the colour rendition and response of my WG-1 than the Q so far. Yes, the WG-1 is more noisy for its pictures, but the texture feel is also stronger!

Comments (6)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Don't agree with you on the DR at all. I think you are missing just how high contrast those scenes are and who knows what settings he's using (for example, if he's using a "vivid" setting, that's less DR). I think this sensor is going to yield surprising DR for what it is and some of the scenes I am seeing.
3 replies · active 706 weeks ago
No problem, there are always some reasons or simply excuses behind.
Hmm what is that supposed to mean? I don't understand.
I meant some people would have to give some explanations about the insufficiency of the Pentax gear, whatever.
Well what I am telling you is not and out of the blue "I want it to be good" reply. I am looking at shots taken with clear sky sunlight, at close to high noon, with areas of shadows and strong light. I don't know if you have shot in a forest, but I had to shoot a wedding in a forest, and I can tell you that contrast is pretty high. I am not trying to make something up because "I want it to sound nice," it's simply my real world experience and when I look at those shots, where the shadows are and the sky they have.

If this is what you meant, I wish you were more direct and tell me directly this is what you think of what I wrote because seriously, I believe I am quite grounded and critical. Also keep in mind as I said - we don't know what mode he was shooting in- a vivid mode easily cuts DR. And these are all JPEGS. Remember that.
1 reply · active 706 weeks ago
Agreed with you

Post a new comment

Comments by