Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: The "Ideal" K-mount Mirrorless

Monday, February 13, 2012

The "Ideal" K-mount Mirrorless

Well, I named mine as the RH-01, which has the following appearance and features! ;-D


(The backdrop is close to the main body colour of the Yellow K-01! I think if I had it, it could look slimmer when put onto that as part of the thick body could be hidden! ;-D)

1. It has a thin and small body!

2. It has an articulated monitor!

3. It has an aperture control ring! That's called the "Hyper Operation" in Pentax terminology! In addition, the aperture can be changed at anytime during video recording!! It also had the H.264 MP4 compressed video in 30 frames (long time ago!) that some Pentax fans has *suddenly* raved about! ;->

4. It weights far less than the K-01! :-o The above combo with a *Pentax K-mount* pancake lens is only at 540g, with flash, battery and memory card plus a light handstrap, too. In fact, the above lens weighs 140g by itself, leaving the body alone weighs only at 400g, which is yet ready to shoot. And, if I used a cheaper adaptor, I can save 30g more!

5. The match is with better outlook and more balanced with all those elegant DA limited pancakes rather than a thin lens on a thick bricky body! >:-(

After all, I am keeping my K-x, same as the K-m, which are yet the smallest and lightest Pentax DSLR bodies and most importantly, they are equipped with a *viewfinder*, if they are meant to be made bigger!


Related:-

The Half-Baked K-mount Mirrorless! >:-(

Size and Weight Comparison for the K-01 (Against K-5, K-r and K-x)

K-01 Poll 1/2: Do You Like about the Design Appearance of the K-01?

K-01 Poll 2/2: How Do You Think about the Practicality of the K-01?

Comments (35)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Hehehe :D
Yesss!
Not a good combo! Compared to the K-01 you need a tripod to make an upright photo. VERY BAD INDEED! :)
1 reply · active 682 weeks ago
4 questions:
- can I attach an external flash? i.e. a REAL external flash?
- are any of my lenses stabilized?
- does it have AF with K-mount lenses?
- can I use my K-mount lenses without having to buy an adapter?
If the answer is "no" for even one of those questions, I'm afraid you can't call it "The Ideal K-mount Mirrorless" ;)

And some corrections:
- HyperOperation implies the presence of a shutter priority mode, as described in the link you gave. Obviously, your NEX don't have a shutter priority mode, thus it can't possibly have HyperOperation. Please do not make up features that doesn't exist.
- I very much doubt that a pancake at the end of a quite long adapter is anywhere near being "balanced" on that super thin camera. It should be like the NEX + a zoom, which isn't balanced.
- It's ugly. The NEX, I mean.
2 replies · active 682 weeks ago
Noooooo i prefer K-01 over this!
I cant get why is this buzz around compact bodies there is so many restrictions of the compact design people just dont get it.They want eye candy not real performance.
4 replies · active 682 weeks ago
I wonder why Pentax didn't make the K-01 much thinner with an additional adapter for K/DA lenses ?
Would the adapter, with electronical and mechanical couplings, have been prohibitivly expensive ?
5 replies · active 682 weeks ago
OmG... this adapter is fat!!! The pancake on it is such a trunk :( Is there AF in fact?
1 reply · active 682 weeks ago
That perfect camera exists and is called Olympus OM-D ;)
3 replies · active 682 weeks ago
Ill take a K-01.
I prefer to hold the camera, not the lens.
I wont say I hate articulated screens but when i had one on a P&S I never used it.
I prefer controls - knob type - to menus.
I want a real hot shoe.
I want my pancake lenses to be pancakes, not a short stack!
Barbarosa's avatar

Barbarosa · 682 weeks ago

I just want to atach my fa35 on K01 and have fun walking and hiking
Why, in my opinion, the NEX3 is not the best K-mount mirrorless:

1. No screw drive - legacy AF lenses become MF - its one reason this thing can be so thin
2. No Pentax power ports - SDM lenses become MF
3. No EVF or OVF (I thought that was one of the knocks against the K-01 you had?)
4. Battery lasts a little longer than half that of the K-01
5. No real hot shoe
6. Not the top rated sensor
7. That body is plastic, right?

Don't get me wrong, I think the NEX system, longterm, makes more sense longterm than the other mirrorless-only systems, as I think the video recorders being made will create an edge over M43, although recent developments in M43 partners mean a fight. Samsung and Fuji will be niche players.

That is the one thing I think Pentax is missing at the moment - a video partner who would create a dedicated camcorder based on the K-Mount. I think that would help tremendously in liveview AF speed, and make the K-mount a real player on all levels. . That and double the sensor in the Q - it will fit...
1 reply · active 682 weeks ago
Such a combination is not ideal. There is almost no grip on this mobilephone shape body. Whitout lens is so-so, but any lens in front makes both of you hends busy just holding :( 1-2 cm thicker body is much more comfortable to hold it one hand even whitout grip. K-01 seems better.
French_Mike's avatar

French_Mike · 682 weeks ago

ticker than the k-01 with 40mm, it dont beat the pentax one, i am sorry
Jeffknightpotter's avatar

Jeffknightpotter · 682 weeks ago

Looks very cool, and has many, many advantages, but you should add these disadvantages:
No shake reduction. Nex dust attracting magnetized sensor very close to the elements when changing lenses in the field. Not really good for use with longer lenses on tripod, unless tripod mount is on the lens itself. Not ideal for people with big hands. Large adapters completely defeat the purpose of smaller body. No autofocus with K-mount lenses. I could go on and on, but your RH-01 looks very cool and pretty and that apparently sells cameras these days!
Brilliant! This RH-01 is a great companion for Pentax owners to have around - small, reasonably priced, and a viewfinder can be mounted if needed.
illdefined's avatar

illdefined · 682 weeks ago

Ha, that's actually really cute Rice.

Note that one of the reasons the grip/box is so big on the K-01 is because it takes the full size K-7/K-5 battery. There shouldn't be any complaints about battery life.
if Pentax had made it... certain people... (not gonna name names...lol) would be hopping mad proclaiming the end of Pentax for making a mirrorless that you have to fold the flash down to flip up the lcd.. and also you can't use k-mounts without a bulky adaptor negating the bennifits of a slim body...
Pentax just can't please some people..
hahaha!
1 reply · active 682 weeks ago
everyone is right in this post.
Nex is ideal for Rice and K-01 for many others. What is the point? If someone wants a NEX, buy it and enjoy; if you feel K-01 is best buy it and enjoy. Case closed!

Post a new comment

Comments by