Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: K-r Vs K-x - What's New and What's Not?

Monday, October 25, 2010

K-r Vs K-x - What's New and What's Not?

My last post talks about new Pentax DSLR manuals are available for download. I have just downloaded the K-r manual and found something that are not so-noticeable for what K-r has but K-x lacks. Here are two summaries for all the major differences, no matter they are already well-known or not:-

Pdf Document Page* of the K-r Manual
New Feature / Improvement
18
Red AF Point Illumination Indication
18
3" VGA Resolution LCD Mon.
19
New Infrared Port
45
Using Li-ion Battery
48 / 322
Optional AA Battery Holder
51
More Battery Indication Levels (Show Battery Type and its Fullness / Emptiness)
101
Expanded ISO Range Up to 25600 (K-x can be Up to 12800)
127
New Option of "Focus Priority" Or "Release Priority" of the AF-S Mode
128
New Option of "Focus Priority" Or "FPS Priority" of the AF-C Mode used In Conjunction With Continuous Frame Advance Mode
129
New AF Assist Light with the Option of Turning Off (K-x has that function but using Flashlight but Without any External LED)
130
New AF Fine Adjustment Function (For how to do similar thing with the K-x, Read Here)
153
New Interval Shooting Function
154
New Multiple Exposure Function
315
Support the 3 FA Limited Lenses for Lens Correction Functions (Similar to the new firmware update of the K-7)

* Remarks:-

1. The document page and the user manual page of the Pentax pdf file are usually mis-aligned, e.g., the Page 101 of the pdf file is actually the Page 99 of the manual, so please take note of this;

2. To go-to a pdf page directly, press Ctrl-N or Shift-Ctrl-N (Depending on the version of the reader).

On the other hand, the following limitations are still the same for both K-r and K-x:-

Pdf Document Page*
Limitation
18
Same 12.4 MP CMOS Sensor (Low Resolution to the Competition)
19
No Cable Switch Socket
28
Mono Sound Recording for Built-in Microphone under Video Mode
170
AF is Not Possible During Video Recording
170
No Still Image Can be Taken During Video Recording (which Canon DSLRs Can)
334
Top Flash X-sync of 1/180th second (Ditto for the K-5 anyway)

Frankly, the K-r is quite feature rich and highly configurable. It should have been the perfect camera without the major discrepancies as listed in the second table. The 12MP is really on the low side for the pixel count by today's standard. And, the lack of a cable switch could be a headache to some whom like to shoot on tripod and monopod with real-time focusing/metering and exposure controls.

Last but not least, the K-r actually consumes a bit more power than the K-x. Just note about the theoretical maximum number of shots possible with the K-x is 1900 whilst for the K-r, it is only 1600, when Lithium AA batteries are used and both measured at 23 Deg. C.

Btw, I am still wondering if I should buy the K-5 or the K-r. But if I am to buy the K-r, this would be the colour I would choose (and maybe also with the DAL 35 with matching colour, too):-



Read Also:-

What Colour Scheme of the K-r Would You Choose?

How to Order a Custom Coloured K-x from Japan by Yourself?

Poll Results and Summary on the Choice of Recent Current Pentax DSLRs

Mega Poll: Current Pentax DSLR Body Selection Dilemmas!

Ten Reasons for Thinking Twice before Decided on a K-5..

K-x Debug Mode Tutorial - AF Adjustment

Comments (19)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
K-5 for sure :-)

Please ensure also that you also improve your shooting techniques, and not only complaining about the tool. Remember that in one of your post you were 'jealous' that someone from China could take excellent pictures only by K-m. On the other hand, I found no extraordinary image from you.
1 reply · active 750 weeks ago
But you're so jealous of me for having so many expensive equipment but took just so many ordinary images then? :-o
Michael A.'s avatar

Michael A. · 750 weeks ago

Looks like your K-r - Silver+Brown.. :o)
Also:

Manual's (not reader) Page 211, 312, 313 - New Lens Correction FA 31, 43, 77mm

Manual's Page 128, 335 - New AF Fine Uniform Adjustment +-10 steps
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Thanks Michael for the supplement. I shall update the post duely.
Rice,
you have commented several times on your preferred color in a camera (blue, silver, etc.), now "matching colors" are a consideration. I think it is time you positively mention that Pentax gives you a choice.

Also, to continue the psychotherapy, your statement "not so-noticeable for what K-r has but K-x lacks" reveals you are one of the guys who see the half-empty glass instead of the half-full.

C
2 replies · active 750 weeks ago
I have promoted their coloured cameras for long, haven't you seen all those? :-) Bottom line: There is a Search button at my Blog, isn't there?
As you are certainly aware, you have made sarcastic remarks about Pentax focusing on the wrong things (things that you secretly appreciate). You have promoted the Sony A55, the Canon 5D, the Nikon D7000 by ignoring shortcomings of those products while mercilessly pointing to and sometimes even inventing or speculating about shortcomings of Pentax products.

Promotion is something else.

(Not that you have to promote anything. But your rants are far from informed and balanced reviews.)

C
今日の一句、どれにしよ、買ったらきっと、興味無し。
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
もとい、「色々と、ブログに書くが、まだ買わぬ。」
thanks for information, it was useful.
major discrepancies? what are you talking about? 12MP is a limitation? to who? that is just silly.
And video, come on who cares about video, do you want it to park your car too?
Rice - thanks for keeping up a running comparative commentary on the various Pentax models. It's really useful to those of us in the real world who want to make informed purchasing decisions but don't have the opportunity to do a complete hands-on personal comparison of the various models. Please keep up the good work even though some of the flamers apparently have too much emotional attachment to specific equipment.
1 reply · active 749 weeks ago
Thanks for your kind encouragement and I shall keep up with my works, for sure! :-)
Rice, thank you for your information. I have one question tough. I am new to DSLR world and I think Pentax K-X/K-R should be my first DSLR. They both have diferent price and from table 1 looks like there is no major change from k-x to k-r except for illuminated VF and AF assist. What do you think? Should I buy k-r since it's new and have 2 major improvement or should i keep my money for k-x and buy a good flash instead?

thanks for your reply. If you hesitated to reply in this blog, could you send to my email?
1 reply · active 742 weeks ago
Without any doubt, the K-x now has better value than the K-r and the IQ is close and any difference is actually insignificant in real world.

But then the K-r is overall a better camera than the K-x, in particular, it eliminates the persistent battery/power issue of the K-x (and back to the first Pentax DSLR *ist D, for all those Pentax DSLRs that use the AA batteries) and its AF system does work faster. But then the K-x and K-r still share the same problems and limitation such as the yellow light front focusing and other quality issues of Pentax as well.

So, afterall, it's all up to you. Of course, if you want to save your bucks to buy a dedicated Pentax flashgun, the K-x is a real bargain. But then the latest should be usually better, just remember..
Michael A.'s avatar

Michael A. · 742 weeks ago

"latest should be usually better" except for $999 Canon 60D ...B&H buyer - "no good for shooting sports. The focus is just too slow." So much for the almighty C... :o)
Rice, thank you for your fast reply. I believe there is no perfect brand, but from a lot of review that I read, Pentax still have the best value for money/feature for still photography (despite not for video which is very bad). Beside, I still can go to C, N, or, S if I found Pentax is not good enough for me.

I think I will go to Pentax K-X with double kit lens (18-55 and 55-300). In indonesia it only cost Rp. 6750000,00 (around $675). Do you think 55-300 is a good choice?

Thank you for your reply.
2 replies · active less than 1 minute ago
Yes, the 55-300 should be a better choice than the DA(L) 50-200, which is not sharp at both ends, i.e. near 50 and 200. So, with the 55-300, you have longer reach and a sharper lens at 200, say. Don't expect very sharp image at 300, though. But you still have it.
Michael A.'s avatar

Michael A. · 741 weeks ago

Excellent advice RH, the high contrast and good sharpness of DA55-300mm makes it a real bargain. There are plenty of samples on DP forum what people can do with it..

Post a new comment

Comments by