http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/longterm/20130426_597538.html
(in Japanese, but the pictures with quick shooting info underneath speak themselves.)
The colour renditions of the two cameras are indeed different. The focus point of the two cameras are somehow different btw. AF or user error?
For instance, look at this set of f/8 shots, which should usually be the aperture of an APS-C camera at 16M, owing to the diffraction limit:-
K-5's Vs K-5IIs' (Look at the building structures as well as the tree leaves; Click to Enlarge; Large Files!)
For the rest of the review and other samples, just read, download and measurbate yourself! :-)
Related:-
Yet Another Late K-5IIs Vs K-5 Comparison Review
After More Than Half a Year, DPR's Half-baked Review(s) on the K-5II and IIs are Published!
• News about Products and Latest Company Direction
• Summaries of Reported Problems and Potential Issues
• Technical Articles on Photographic Gear and Technologies
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
DC Watch K-5IIs Vs K-5 Shootout Test, with Large Samples
標籤:
Colour Accuracy,
Image Quality,
K-5,
K-5II/s,
Lenses,
Reviews,
Samples
Comments (5)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
Post a new comment
Comments by IntenseDebate
DC Watch K-5IIs Vs K-5 Shootout Test, with Large Samples
2013-04-30T12:41:00+08:00
RiceHigh
Colour Accuracy|Image Quality|K-5|K-5II/s|Lenses|Reviews|Samples|
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
jaad75 · 622 weeks ago
jaad75 · 622 weeks ago
The difference here is quite visible...
zosX · 622 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 622 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 622 weeks ago