http://dcdv.zol.com.cn/277/2776684_all.html#p2779688
(in Simplified Chinese)
Via: DSLR Maniac (Japanese)
(Original pictures from the Imaging Resource - The ZOL simply cropped and pasted them together side-by-side for direct and easy comparisons!)
Wow, the ISO 1600 of the 5D3 is more detailed and less noisy than the ISO 400 of the 5D2 for all tests and ditto for ISO 3200 shots Vs 800 ones for the two bodies! Oh, really? :-o
Once again, it's time for me this pity guy to save my money for a new 5D3! ;-D And, the measurbations will never end! :-(
• News about Products and Latest Company Direction
• Summaries of Reported Problems and Potential Issues
• Technical Articles on Photographic Gear and Technologies
Friday, March 09, 2012
Comments (7)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
Post a new comment
Comments by IntenseDebate
5D2 Vs 5D3 ISO Shootouts x4 (Impressive Results!)
2012-03-09T17:22:00+08:00
RiceHigh
Full Frame|Image Quality|My Blog|My Gear|Other Bodies|Other Systems|Reviews|Samples|
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Leon · 682 weeks ago
Enche Tjin · 682 weeks ago
krasitsky 35p · 682 weeks ago
Toomas Kadarpik · 682 weeks ago
I decided to test Fuji xpro1 d800 and 5d3, the first is an amazing pocketable and probably wipes out k5, 5d2 will be upgraded to 5d3 if metering is close to nikon and af really works in -2EV
bandymelis · 681 weeks ago
Download and see. Nothing special. Even though the samples are from a preproduction unit, they do not leave a big impression. And when the file size of 36MP images is taken into consideration, the D800 does not even look appealing at all.
Paul · 681 weeks ago
I think Canon got everything right with the 5d3. Although I'm won't be purchasing it (I still believe the 5d2 is a great camera), I can see why it'll be a desirable camera
RiceHigh 110p · 681 weeks ago