See:-
http://www.pentax.jp/japan/imaging/digital/medium/645d/ex.html
(in Japanese)
First, there is no sample by the new kit prime. Second, there is no portrait sample. Isn't that the 645D is targeted to be a studio camera? Why no portrait??
Nevertheless, I am completely not impressed with the Image Quality, Colour Accuracy and Exposure Accuracy of all those samples. Image look dark, colours look dull and unfavourable whilst greens look too ex-exaggerated than real. Digital sharpening is just too obvious and they are actually like those pictures from a P&S when you look into the pictures at full size! Just a total disappointment, if I have to say..
Do note that the samples are now made with firmware version 1.00 as shown in the *main* EXIF tag. Which means that they *should* be coming from a production 645D. I hope Pentax/Hoya this time do not cheat like what they did previous times with their K-7 and K-x when they were just launched. But then, on the other hand, if those samples are really from a production unit, then it is really worrisome!
In fact, just a few days ago when I saw this hands-on report and video, I suspected that the 645D was still half-baked. Why? There was nothing useful demonstrated but actually this demonstration and the "findings" of that hands-on are of no difference from anyone handles any newer Pentax DSLR! There is actually nothing in-depth nor anything useful about the 645D for this "pre-production" unit and demo! (So, I just opted not to report that and include the link here last time when I saw it.)
Lastly, I think I just want to air this out: IF the IQ of the 645D is just like this, why Pentax/Hoya needed to waste the time and resources to put out such crap? And at that price tag, who would buy such a crap (possibly..)? Frankly, they should concentrate to make a Full Frame K-mount DSLR instead. Or, even just to make an EVIL first, in order to secure their market position and share! :-(
Recent Related Articles:-
What True IQ Should be Expected from a 40MP MF DSLR?
645D and Lens Delayed!
• News about Products and Latest Company Direction
• Summaries of Reported Problems and Potential Issues
• Technical Articles on Photographic Gear and Technologies
Thursday, May 20, 2010
Comments (32)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
Post a new comment
Comments by IntenseDebate
Official 645D Production Sample Images Are Out
2010-05-20T08:28:00+08:00
RiceHigh
645D|Colour Accuracy|Exposure Accuracy|Image Quality|Issues|Pentax|Samples|Software|
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Beavis and · 773 weeks ago
356 · 773 weeks ago
Bear76 · 773 weeks ago
http://ganref.jp/magazines/index/1/0/366
check here - outstanding super fine JPEG and one photo - DNG via ACR (57 MB JPEG file)....COOL
As for official samples -
have a look at exif. IT'S JUST VARIOUS KIND OF JPEG
Super fine JPEG
Software development 645D Ver.1.00 (in-camera RAW development)
1-st sample
Saturation 0
Hue 0
Key 0
Sharpness 1 (Fine Sharpness OFF)
Contrast 1
D-Range set Highlight correction: OFF / Shadow Correction: OFF
Custom Images Landscape
Second sample
All settings ZERO
D-Range set Highlights compensation: ON / Shadow Correction: OFF
Custom image reversal film
3rd sample
Saturation 0
Hue 0
Key 0
Sharpness 1 (Fine Sharpness OFF)
Contrast 1
D-Range set Highlight correction: OFF / Shadow Correction: OFF
Custom Images Landscape
4 and 5 samples
All settings ZERO
D-Range set Highlights compensation: ON / Shadow Correction: OFF
4 th - Custom image reversal film
5 th - Custom Image Natural
45-85/4.5 and 150-300/5.6 are COOL...
What are you talking about????
Bear76 · 773 weeks ago
As for FF - it's funny. I know Canon's JPEG in FF cameras very good. It's mediocre. And it's only 21 MP.:))))
Bear76 · 773 weeks ago
Do you wait for miracle from this very simple converter which works with in-camera processor. It has very weak computational power and very decent settings. It's not PC. Think!!!
1, 4 and 5 samples from Pentax site are VERY GOOD. Outstanding resolution and colours. Why are you so stubborn?
Why do you ignore facts???
I never see outstanding samples from official sites of any companies. Give us a link if you have.
Zebooka · 773 weeks ago
Didn't you know that?
^)
Between, I like greens (however on some shots they are a little bit oversaturated IMHO)
Alexander · 773 weeks ago
This is another system, another world, other matrices. At first I thought it was a joke. Open your eyes!
This is a great camera!
Allways + · 772 weeks ago
Outstanding resolution and very beautiful colors at first sample.
3rd image is a bit over-sharped and over-contrasted. But I don't see any problem.
In-camera JPEG is easy to tweak.
The sample from FF Canon at f8 is in another league. Much lower resolution, very soft corners.
We can get close picture from APS-C camera.
My advices for Rice are
think twice,
examine all photos one more time - esp. JPEG from DNG via ACR (Photoshop CS4 for Mac),
and be smart man - change your posts. All what you've wrote - conscious discredit of 645D.
I've compared Canon landscape with really bad corners and 645D's landscape. It's earth and heaven.
Canon is in the deep dust. Even with K-x (+ good Pentax prime) you can get landscape not worse than Canon FF.
jonas · 772 weeks ago
Chuck · 772 weeks ago