Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: Official 645D Production Sample Images Are Out

Thursday, May 20, 2010

Official 645D Production Sample Images Are Out

See:-

http://www.pentax.jp/japan/imaging/digital/medium/645d/ex.html
(in Japanese)

First, there is no sample by the new kit prime. Second, there is no portrait sample. Isn't that the 645D is targeted to be a studio camera? Why no portrait??

Nevertheless, I am completely not impressed with the Image Quality, Colour Accuracy and Exposure Accuracy of all those samples. Image look dark, colours look dull and unfavourable whilst greens look too ex-exaggerated than real. Digital sharpening is just too obvious and they are actually like those pictures from a P&S when you look into the pictures at full size! Just a total disappointment, if I have to say..

Do note that the samples are now made with firmware version 1.00 as shown in the *main* EXIF tag. Which means that they *should* be coming from a production 645D. I hope Pentax/Hoya this time do not cheat like what they did previous times with their K-7 and K-x when they were just launched. But then, on the other hand, if those samples are really from a production unit, then it is really worrisome!

In fact, just a few days ago when I saw this hands-on report and video, I suspected that the 645D was still half-baked. Why? There was nothing useful demonstrated but actually this demonstration and the "findings" of that hands-on are of no difference from anyone handles any newer Pentax DSLR! There is actually nothing in-depth nor anything useful about the 645D for this "pre-production" unit and demo! (So, I just opted not to report that and include the link here last time when I saw it.)

Lastly, I think I just want to air this out: IF the IQ of the 645D is just like this, why Pentax/Hoya needed to waste the time and resources to put out such crap? And at that price tag, who would buy such a crap (possibly..)? Frankly, they should concentrate to make a Full Frame K-mount DSLR instead. Or, even just to make an EVIL first, in order to secure their market position and share! :-(


Recent Related Articles:-


What True IQ Should be Expected from a 40MP MF DSLR?

645D and Lens Delayed!

Comments (32)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Beavis and 's avatar

Beavis and · 773 weeks ago

Ah, how would you check for color accuracy when you are not there?
3 replies · active 773 weeks ago
9 replies · active 773 weeks ago
Rice, are you kidding?
http://ganref.jp/magazines/index/1/0/366
check here - outstanding super fine JPEG and one photo - DNG via ACR (57 MB JPEG file)....COOL

As for official samples -
have a look at exif. IT'S JUST VARIOUS KIND OF JPEG

Super fine JPEG
Software development 645D Ver.1.00 (in-camera RAW development)

1-st sample
Saturation 0
Hue 0
Key 0
Sharpness 1 (Fine Sharpness OFF)
Contrast 1
D-Range set Highlight correction: OFF / Shadow Correction: OFF
Custom Images Landscape

Second sample
All settings ZERO
D-Range set Highlights compensation: ON / Shadow Correction: OFF
Custom image reversal film

3rd sample
Saturation 0
Hue 0
Key 0
Sharpness 1 (Fine Sharpness OFF)
Contrast 1
D-Range set Highlight correction: OFF / Shadow Correction: OFF
Custom Images Landscape

4 and 5 samples
All settings ZERO
D-Range set Highlights compensation: ON / Shadow Correction: OFF

4 th - Custom image reversal film
5 th - Custom Image Natural

45-85/4.5 and 150-300/5.6 are COOL...

What are you talking about????
Compare 57 MB JPEG from ACR with any FF camera and relax. It's another level.
As for FF - it's funny. I know Canon's JPEG in FF cameras very good. It's mediocre. And it's only 21 MP.:))))
Rice, official samples are not bad, especially if you switch your brain on. It's JPEG FROM IN-CAMERA RAW CONVERTER.
Do you wait for miracle from this very simple converter which works with in-camera processor. It has very weak computational power and very decent settings. It's not PC. Think!!!
1, 4 and 5 samples from Pentax site are VERY GOOD. Outstanding resolution and colours. Why are you so stubborn?
Why do you ignore facts???

I never see outstanding samples from official sites of any companies. Give us a link if you have.
8 replies · active 773 weeks ago
645D is targeted to be a outdoor camera too. That's why it is weather sealed.

Didn't you know that?

^)

Between, I like greens (however on some shots they are a little bit oversaturated IMHO)
Alexander's avatar

Alexander · 773 weeks ago

Very funny conclusion you did. Even funnier to compare images from Canon.
This is another system, another world, other matrices. At first I thought it was a joke. Open your eyes!
This is a great camera!
1 reply · active 773 weeks ago
Cool images. For JPEG from in-camera converter are very good.
Outstanding resolution and very beautiful colors at first sample.
3rd image is a bit over-sharped and over-contrasted. But I don't see any problem.
In-camera JPEG is easy to tweak.

The sample from FF Canon at f8 is in another league. Much lower resolution, very soft corners.
We can get close picture from APS-C camera.

My advices for Rice are
think twice,
examine all photos one more time - esp. JPEG from DNG via ACR (Photoshop CS4 for Mac),
and be smart man - change your posts. All what you've wrote - conscious discredit of 645D.

I've compared Canon landscape with really bad corners and 645D's landscape. It's earth and heaven.
Canon is in the deep dust. Even with K-x (+ good Pentax prime) you can get landscape not worse than Canon FF.
You must be drunk if you find them similar to P&S pictures. No more comments.
Rice---You're definitely NOT a valid critic. A legitimate critic does not judge a camera simply from jpeg-in camera processed images, and does not judge a camera when he has not tested one himself. In fact, he doesn't have one in his hand, so how can one judge a camera when it's not available yet? Rice, fyi, this camera will be released in Japan June 11. In June, the REAL experts will give us a full legitimate review of this camera!
1 reply · active 772 weeks ago

Post a new comment

Comments by