Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: K-x' Durability/Production Quality is Just a Joke!

Thursday, September 02, 2010

K-x' Durability/Production Quality is Just a Joke!

That's what recently the various issues that Hinman has encountered with his beloved K-x White, see his latest report:-

http://www.techtheman.com/2010/08/pentax-k-x-dead-with-memory-card-error.html



The memory card unit of his unit was dead, the silver painting of the K-x rim peels off, the red SR label and logo got detached and lost "accidentally"! I do feel much for him indeed.



In fact, this is what I'd reported back to January for the same problem reported by another user. The case is not isolated actually, as the first black K-x unit I tested for my K-x review just suffered from the same:-

http://ricehigh.blogspot.com/2010/01/200-colours-of-pentax-k-x.html

IIRC, Hin bought his unit just for about half year ago and so did mine which was bought close to that. How about my Navy Blue K-x then? Although I would say I am yet more fortunate than Hin, still, the Shiny Navy Blue coating are now getting off from the lower boundary of the RTF of my K-x!? Now, the wound can be the starting point for further peeling-off of the Navy Blue coat! I shall add some photos later to show the problem and for better illustration when I have the time. In view of the problem, I have just stopped using my K-x so as to prevent further "damage" to it and I shall head to the local Pentax service centre for asking for a rectification, hopefully a "permanent" remedial if there is any, which I shall insist and ask for!

Furthermore, I must tell that my K-x has actually been under very light use (as I have many cameras) and I do always take great care with any of my gear and clean them each time after use (with a gently wet soft towel and cleaned with clean water only). I have used my K-x for taking only three thousand something pictures. I just couldn't imagine the Navy Blue coating/painting is just so brittle and could get off like that!

Hoya/Pentax, how come you've made the Pentax cameras and bodies so vulnerable? Do you just think that they are toys but not photographic equipment?? >:-( When the cosmetics of the Pentax bodies are just so easily to break and peel off, what's the point of having 100 or 120 colours and "beautiful" choices? :-o (Not even to mention even the electronics are so easily to refuse to work anymore, just like Hin's camera!)

Last but not least, when I looked back, the "brittle" shiny coating of my Shiny K-x is not an isolated case, as this did happen with my brand new first Navy Blue K-x unit (for one position only, though) that was returned, owing to the serious Back Focusing issue, which I cured partially with the Debug mode myself but for infinity objects, the AF accuracy is yet affected, although it is just not so *easily noticeable*.

I hope not the coming K-R will suffer from the same problem, no matter how wonderful the new colours and appearance of the new body will be! In fact, I do always hope Hoya do review the common defects and reports and try their best to get rid of those in the coming new camera(s) and lens(es). But then history does tell and remind that they are not likely to act in a positive way, as we can see from the persistent SDM issue which is still received no response of any nor any real improvement in design/production up till now, even after so many years!

Comments (15)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Let's not forget that the K-x is meant for the bottom end of the market. The same market segment that buys iPods and iPhones. Those people are used to stuff that shows after months of use. The K-x is not better built than any new gadget because it's not supposed to work forever. This is how the modern market works, unfortunately.

Having said that: my K-7 which already has 13,000 pictures on the counter still looks like new. No sign of wear anywhere. So ultimately you get what you pay for...
2 replies · active 757 weeks ago
Yea sure, better yet stick your fingers in your ears and go lalalala if you can't accept that Pentax sucks. How about the ancient Nikon D40. Anything peeling off? I don't think so
Its sad afterall for a newly purchased camera that will look like this and that just after half year of use.
I have a white K-x and it still looks like new, but I do use it a lot and under all conditions. This winter I used it for photographing a dog sled race, and the temperature went below -30 c, and it did just fine. I took it inside from time to time and didn't protect it any, and then out again, several times, it just kept working.

Also I've been in plenty of rain this summer, it works fine wet too. I've had it in sandy and dusty environments, and that didn't stop it either.

These incidents you report seem to me like people who have been unlucky and not the standard for the K-x' durability. If it is, can you show me that this is what more often than not do happen? That it breaks I mean.

I haven't used the K-x any more carefully than I did my previous camera, the K10D (with grip) and it works just as well.
its the same with cars too. .my trucks paint is flaking off....
but for my kx its still good as new. I think just like everything there are batches that last and batches that have poor quality. The kx is was not built like the older Pentax bodies like ist D and ist DS and k100. Its more low end, very basic. But Some people use it all the time and have had no problems. Go figure.
Barbarosa's avatar

Barbarosa · 758 weeks ago

i have K-m which have same body like K-x, and canon 500 seems like joke comparing to this one.
after one year is like new and no signs of use and i use it a lot
before couple days my little daughter topple it form tripod 1,5 meter extended on floor and nothing happens
so Pentax body is real strong and durable especial compared to canon entry lvl cameras.
maybe is problem with painted bodies not with black ones
thanks for the info. I also have a black K-m for almost 1.5 years and have noticed some chrome falling off on the silver lining, now that youve mentioned it:) I guess it could be better, but i see it as a purely aesthetic problem and not a functional one. Still looks new otherwise, so i guess its alright. Ive been however very sceptical of buying any SDM glass because of what ive read in the forums, so i guess you do have a point with quality control.
Michael A.'s avatar

Michael A. · 758 weeks ago

Sorry to hear of anyone's trouble with cameras. Long exposure to heat (sun) on car's dash board can be a culprit to peeled paint or fried photo gear. My navy blue K-x works and looks near new after 3000+ actuations and DA* 50-135mm SDM as well, no issue. It's true we hear mostly from people having problems, since majority what isn't experiencing any, are taking pictures and don't read blogs....
2 replies · active less than 1 minute ago
I have no abuse nor mis-use of my K-x as I do always love all of my gear and treat them as treasure ( so you should really know how frustrated I were when Pentax Japan destroyed my Silver *ist DS during the course of re-calibration for the AF! :-( ). And, as you can see from my posts for photos of my gear posted, I do keep my gear in very new conditions even after decades of use.

The (small) cracks/chips in my K-x' RTF seem to be a design issue and I shall tell more about it when I have the time, with some (macro) photos to be taken and post and with more explanations, too.
Michael A.'s avatar

Michael A. · 757 weeks ago

Yes RH, it's very obvious you admire and appreciate photo gear of any kind (I do too..). I do find it unfair you have to deal with less than expected for your money. Hope you get some resolution from Pentax, since this should be a warranty issue. Just checked again K-x Navy I have, and there is NOTHING besides about 3 specs of dust in viewfinder and a very light trace on k-mount from lenses what would make it look any different from new.
And again, my old KX (lost meter), ME Super (used it since 1983), LX, MZ-3 & istD look and work great as well. So generally, Pentax gear should last really long time in my experience...
One, no wait two people have an issue and Rice is saying they're garbage ......
Sounds like the first guy was just really hard on his camera and now wants to blame it on a 'brittle' product. It's like they old joke about the mother getting turtle from the pet store for her. Son

and Rice, what is the real story why you don't use your Kx? I thought it was your 4/3ccamera, or your Nex or a pointandshoot
why really
1 reply · active 758 weeks ago
Haven't you read what I've written, man? My K-x has cracks and chips just appeared and hence I dare not to use it more as the cracks will probably expand in area if I do so.

I have just used my K-x for a country side walk last Friday and actually it is a joy to use and the PQ is still good. After my last use, the cracks/chips came up.
It broke my heart when I read Hin's original review a few days ago. I got my K-x (Black) in November 2009. So far, so chips, no cracks nor any other problems for that matter. I hope it stays that way...

RiceHigh, best of luck dealing with Pentax. :-)
Hello Rice,

Have you already posted some examples of the Cracks of your K-X you mean with this blog.

You would post some examples i read.
When ?
1 reply · active 755 weeks ago

Post a new comment

Comments by