Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: Carl Zeiss E 24/1.8 on NEX-5N Samples

Friday, September 02, 2011

Carl Zeiss E 24/1.8 on NEX-5N Samples

http://www.photographyblog.com/previews/carl_zeiss_24mm_emount_lens_photos/

Those samples indeed look quite nice! I meant for the IQ.

Btw, the price of the NEX-5N is comparable to the Pentax Q's, right? But is the IQ comparable? I'm afraid not! And then how much the Q is smaller? Not by that much! :-o >:-(
Time (UTC +0800):
標籤： , , , , , ,

Comments (4)

Loading... Logging you in...
Dashboard | Edit profile | Logout
  • Logged in as
+2 Vote up Vote down
keithj's avatar

keithj · 707 weeks ago

You're right about IQ of course, but I think the main size/weight difference is in the lens; the APS-C lens is always going to be a lot larger and heavier than an "equivalent" lens for the smaller formats (though the difference will vary according to how you interpret the word "equivalent").
1 reply · active 707 weeks ago
Loading...
0 Vote up Vote down
RiceHigh's avatar - Go to profile

RiceHigh 110p · 707 weeks ago

I hope things will be improved, like Pana has successfully downsized their m4/3 lenses finally with their new X-series "HD" lenses.
0 Vote up Vote down
OGL's avatar

OGL · 707 weeks ago

At ISO1600 - I don't see any IQ from NEX.
0 Vote up Vote down
Raist3d's avatar

Raist3d · 707 weeks ago

The size of the nex system does not compare to the q at all. Not only the body is bigger but those lenses are huge compared to the system. Even microfour third lenses are bigger.

It would be nice if you could Artie more objectively about these pros and cons. And the good nex Sony lenses are all very pricey. The q at least comes with one good lens. Te kit lens of the nex isn't very good.

Post a new comment

Comments by

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)