http://www.popco.net/zboard/view.php?id=dica_review&page=1&sn1=&divpage=1&category=21&sn=off&ss=on&sc=on&select_arrange=reg_date&desc=desc&no=732
Ooops.. It should read "Popco"! ;-D
Btw, Google translation (or whatsoever of the Net) does not work as the review, as usual of theirs, is posted with all JPEGs with overlaid text!
But the photos posted speak for themselves anyway. In particular, see these:-




Well, here comes the main problem, the standard zoom of the Q is considered bulky and is comparable in size to the m4/3 kit zoom of Oly, which also in 3X zoom range optically, despite the much smaller Q sensor!

And, putting a Pentax 540 flash on top of the Q via the hotshoe is just a strange combination, which looks rather odd and simply, terrible! And, I just wish to ask: HOW to hold and use this combined monster?! :-o

But it is still interesting to note that now the top X-sync (not HSS) speed is 1/250th second, which is the fastest speed of a Pentax ILC/SLR since the Z-1/p in these twenty years in the Pentaxland! The small sensor of the Q facilitates this comes into reality, nonetheless.
R.I.P. Pentax · 706 weeks ago
In the proceeding comparison, the Q sensor is not shown in comparison to the Sony NEX C3.
An APS-C sensor is about twice as large as an M4/3 sensor; an M4/3 sensor already dwarfs the Q's midget sensor.
What is Pentax concealing? That their mirrorless Q camera is a joke with a point and shoot sensor?
Sad and deceitful. The Sony C3 and even the Sony NEX 5N are a much better value.
Shame on you Pentax. Pentax needs to offer products that its customers want and will buy. Not this Q turd.
Where is Full Frame? Where is a mirrorless APS-C camera?
R.I.P. Pentax.
Raist3d · 706 weeks ago
triplight · 706 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 706 weeks ago
triplight · 706 weeks ago
So I assume that the zoom is, too, since it has a metal mount. Not sure, maybe someone reading here can confirm. All the toy lenses of course are plastic barrel & mount (and priced accordingly).
triplight · 706 weeks ago
triplight · 705 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 705 weeks ago
Steve · 706 weeks ago
Steve · 706 weeks ago
http://asia.cnet.com/i/r/2011/dc/45601760/sc001.j...
john · 706 weeks ago
http://www.flickr.com/photos/11899953@N02/sets/72...
Raist3d · 706 weeks ago
Again, not trying to trash the Nex, but just putting things in perspective.
Also the Q seems to do way way better than most expected:
http://nedbunnell.posterous.com/
Those are shot in RAW, converted with Silky Pix included which for the reasons explained does better and even though they are not full sized shots, they are still decently big and ISO 400/800. Of course, the photographer matters too :-)
OGL · 706 weeks ago
by the way....Pentax Q had manual control in video
RiceHigh 110p · 706 weeks ago
Raist3d · 706 weeks ago
Raist3d · 706 weeks ago