Web Analytics RiceHigh's Pentax Blog: Korean Popcorn (;->) Pentax Q First Preview

Friday, September 09, 2011

Korean Popcorn (;->) Pentax Q First Preview

Look at here:-

http://www.popco.net/zboard/view.php?id=dica_review&page=1&sn1=&divpage=1&category=21&sn=off&ss=on&sc=on&select_arrange=reg_date&desc=desc&no=732

Ooops.. It should read "Popco"! ;-D

Btw, Google translation (or whatsoever of the Net) does not work as the review, as usual of theirs, is posted with all JPEGs with overlaid text!

But the photos posted speak for themselves anyway. In particular, see these:-









Well, here comes the main problem, the standard zoom of the Q is considered bulky and is comparable in size to the m4/3 kit zoom of Oly, which also in 3X zoom range optically, despite the much smaller Q sensor!



And, putting a Pentax 540 flash on top of the Q via the hotshoe is just a strange combination, which looks rather odd and simply, terrible! And, I just wish to ask: HOW to hold and use this combined monster?! :-o



But it is still interesting to note that now the top X-sync (not HSS) speed is 1/250th second, which is the fastest speed of a Pentax ILC/SLR since the Z-1/p in these twenty years in the Pentaxland! The small sensor of the Q facilitates this comes into reality, nonetheless.

Comments (16)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
R.I.P. Pentax's avatar

R.I.P. Pentax · 706 weeks ago

In the first comparison, the sensor of the Q is shown, as is the sensor of the M4/3 Pansonic.

In the proceeding comparison, the Q sensor is not shown in comparison to the Sony NEX C3.

An APS-C sensor is about twice as large as an M4/3 sensor; an M4/3 sensor already dwarfs the Q's midget sensor.

What is Pentax concealing? That their mirrorless Q camera is a joke with a point and shoot sensor?

Sad and deceitful. The Sony C3 and even the Sony NEX 5N are a much better value.

Shame on you Pentax. Pentax needs to offer products that its customers want and will buy. Not this Q turd.

Where is Full Frame? Where is a mirrorless APS-C camera?

R.I.P. Pentax.
1 reply · active 706 weeks ago
Funny that you are going by looking at the sensors only without looking at their performance. But then what to expect from someone called "RIP Pentax" :-)
The Q zoom is little larger than expected, but not bad. At least it's faster than the usual kit lens, plus it seems to have good construction with a metal mount (and metal barrel, I think). Same price in the U.S. as the new Olympus 14-42 which is all plastic and should be no more than $200 MSRP.
5 replies · active 705 weeks ago
AFAIK, all the Q lenses are made of plastic for the lens barrels.
Imaging Resource mentions that the 01 prime is steel mount and barrel: http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/PENTAXQ/PEN...

So I assume that the zoom is, too, since it has a metal mount. Not sure, maybe someone reading here can confirm. All the toy lenses of course are plastic barrel & mount (and priced accordingly).
Actually, re-reading the IR comment it's not really clear about the lens construction other than the mount. My Q should arrive Tuesday, I'll follow up here when I get my hands on the lens.
It's in my hands. You're right - plastic outer barrel. :(
By looking at the product images of it, I was almost sure that it was made of plastic! :-)
The new GF3X with zoom is even small than the Q zoom.
1 reply · active 706 weeks ago
This is what the new GF3X zoom looks like.
http://asia.cnet.com/i/r/2011/dc/45601760/sc001.j...
I dont know how I feel about the Q yet, but her are the latest pics someone has taken with it.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/11899953@N02/sets/72...
Actually the lens are quite a bit smaller- even the zoom. It's the kind of thing that you need to see in hand. And please don't get me started on the Nex. The Nex is a great camera body saddled with mostly big lenses. The new lenses Sony just released or about to are good. But that pancake shown is a POS.

Again, not trying to trash the Nex, but just putting things in perspective.

Also the Q seems to do way way better than most expected:
http://nedbunnell.posterous.com/

Those are shot in RAW, converted with Silky Pix included which for the reasons explained does better and even though they are not full sized shots, they are still decently big and ISO 400/800. Of course, the photographer matters too :-)
http://limteckchan.wordpress.com/2011/09/10/penta...

by the way....Pentax Q had manual control in video
3 replies · active 706 weeks ago
It shows that it has exposure compenstion during video recording, but not full Tv or Av control.
Actually no, you are not correct. The photos show a sequence of modifying Aperture or Shutter individually. Moreover, it's in the Pentax Q English manual, page 110?
(without the ? at the end of 110 :-) ).

Post a new comment

Comments by