http://news.mapcamera.com/sittoku.php?itemid=11821
(in Japanese, English page here (Google-translated))

The body size is not as small as Pentax has been emphasizing..

Well, the kit prime lens is somehow small:-

But, I'm afraid that the sensor is even smaller!

That guy has purchased all the 3 toy lenses, too:-

The toy lenses are put side-by-side to a DA18-55WR lens:-

In addition, the new Q owner has posted five full size original samples. I am not convinced much with the colour rendition anyway, which looks somehow odd and unnatural. Three of which anyway:-



(ABOVE: First Picture: 8.5mm, f/4.5, ISO 125; Second Picture: 8.5mm, f/2.8, ISO 1600; Last: 8.5mm, f/3.2, ISO 125 - Click to Download/Enlarge)
Btw and after all, the prices of the Pentax Q and ktis/lenses are more expensive than all the other entry level ILDCs on the market. So, does it mean that the Q is not entry level and could provide more superior image quality and results? :-o ;-)
Related:-
Official On Sales Dates of the Pentax Q Kits, Lenses and Accessories
Leaked Pentax Marketing Q&As in the P-Q Pre-Release Press Conference
Heart of the Pentax Q - Sony IMX078CQK Imager
Highlights on the Q Specifications
What is your buying intention of the Pentax Q?
The Pentax Q Announced!
frank · 706 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 706 weeks ago
Raist3d · 706 weeks ago
I agree with you the first shot (landscape) doesn't look all that hot at all. The low night shot considering the light, ISO 1600 doesn't look horrible for a camera this class, but nevertheless is not ideal. Pentax still manages to keep the color though which is surprising.
The flower shot is ok but it could have been better exposed.
I find these other customer images much more compelling:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/eries/6098303263/siz...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/eries/6099765016/in/...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bastianlende/6097206...
George K · 641 weeks ago
the shot of the pentax Q taken with the Sony DSC-TX10 which looks awesome. http://www.flickr.com/photos/eries/6098303607/in/...
Raist3d · 706 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 706 weeks ago
Furthermore, there is no need to type html codes for URLs as links will be automatically converted by the server.
Raist3d · 706 weeks ago
AF52 · 706 weeks ago
RiceHigh 110p · 706 weeks ago
PeakVT · 705 weeks ago